***** Starting new run
RUN #1 at 16.05.2003 15:47:15 using Partitioning program based on RefVal 4.0

Input data for subgroup 1 in RUN #1 is read from file: 
C:\LAK_lsd\gtfu40.txt
283 reference values entered

LISTING OF SORTED INPUT DATA (first ~10% of the data points .. last ~10% of the data points)

    8.13    9.10    9.14    9.29    9.66    9.94   10.01   10.14   10.31   10.44
   10.78   10.95   11.03   11.03   11.14   11.16   11.31   11.57   11.57   11.59
   11.59   11.62   11.63   11.69   11.69   11.73   11.74   11.81
..
   29.50   29.71   29.98   30.10   30.74   31.35   31.87   31.91   32.02   32.46
   33.03   33.24   33.39   33.55   34.41   34.71   35.40   36.86   37.76   37.81
   42.59   43.06   48.44   50.40   53.86   62.89   69.36  108.80

DISTRIBUTION OF INPUT DATA

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1     13.43    53    53   0.187   0.187
       2     18.73   123   176   0.435   0.622
       3     24.03    55   231   0.194   0.816
       4     29.32    23   254   0.081   0.898
       5     34.62    16   270   0.057   0.954
       6     39.92     5   275   0.018   0.972
       7     45.22     2   277   0.007   0.979
       8     50.52     2   279   0.007   0.986
       9     55.82     1   280   0.004   0.989
      10     61.11     0   280   0.000   0.989
      11     66.41     1   281   0.004   0.993
      12     71.71     1   282   0.004   0.996
      13     77.01     0   282   0.000   0.996
      14     82.31     0   282   0.000   0.996
      15     87.61     0   282   0.000   0.996
      16     92.90     0   282   0.000   0.996
      17     98.20     0   282   0.000   0.996
      18    103.50     0   282   0.000   0.996
      19    108.80     1   283   0.004   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 |   .
       2 |>
       3 | .
       4 |     .              .              .
       5 |            .              .              .
       6 |         .              .              .              .
       7 |            .              .              .              .
       8 |            .              .              .              .
       9 |             .              .              .              .
      10 |              .              .              .              .
      11 |             .              .              .              .
      12 |             .              .              .              .
      13 |              .              .              .              .
      14 |              .              .              .              .
      15 |              .              .              .              .
      16 |              .              .              .              .
      17 |              .              .              .              .
      18 |              .              .              .              .
      19 |             .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

1 outlier(s) dropped:
         108.80
282 values are remaining

DISTRIBUTION WITH OUTLIER(S) REMOVED

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1     11.35    17    17   0.060   0.060
       2     14.58    66    83   0.234   0.294
       3     17.80    73   156   0.259   0.553
       4     21.02    50   206   0.177   0.730
       5     24.24    25   231   0.089   0.819
       6     27.47    17   248   0.060   0.879
       7     30.69    11   259   0.039   0.918
       8     33.91    10   269   0.035   0.954
       9     37.13     4   273   0.014   0.968
      10     40.36     2   275   0.007   0.975
      11     43.58     2   277   0.007   0.982
      12     46.80     0   277   0.000   0.982
      13     50.02     1   278   0.004   0.986
      14     53.25     1   279   0.004   0.989
      15     56.47     1   280   0.004   0.993
      16     59.69     0   280   0.000   0.993
      17     62.91     1   281   0.004   0.996
      18     66.14     0   281   0.000   0.996
      19     69.36     1   282   0.004   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 |           .              .              .
       2 |>
       3 |>
       4 |      .
       5 |  .              .              .
       6 |           .              .              .
       7 |  .              .              .              .
       8 |   .              .              .              .
       9 |          .              .              .              .
      10 |            .              .              .              .
      11 |            .              .              .              .
      12 |              .              .              .              .
      13 |             .              .              .              .
      14 |             .              .              .              .
      15 |             .              .              .              .
      16 |              .              .              .              .
      17 |             .              .              .              .
      18 |              .              .              .              .
      19 |             .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TO GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION

                                 Value    Prob
Coefficient of skewness:         2.447   0.000
Coefficient of kurtosis:         9.133   0.000
Anderson-Darling's Asquare:     13.119   0.000
Cramer-von Mises's Wsquare:      2.346   0.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's Dmax:       0.157   0.000

ESTIMATES OF REFERENCE LIMITS AND THEIR CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Non-parametric estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       10.02         9.14 ..   11.03
        0.975       42.23        34.41 ..   53.86

Bootstrap estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       10.13         9.38 ..   10.88
        0.975       41.51        32.83 ..   50.19

Input data for subgroup 2 in RUN #1 is read from file: 
C:\LAK_lsd\gtfo40.txt
445 reference values entered

LISTING OF SORTED INPUT DATA (first ~10% of the data points .. last ~10% of the data points)

    8.55    9.11    9.78    9.97    9.99   10.14   10.15   10.41   10.56   10.62
   10.65   10.75   10.77   11.00   11.04   11.17   11.24   11.41   11.52   11.58
   11.72   11.78   11.80   11.95   11.96   12.17   12.18   12.31   12.56   12.61
   12.67   12.68   12.69   12.73   12.78   12.81   12.89   12.89   12.98   13.01
   13.04   13.09   13.10   13.17
..
   40.65   40.75   41.00   41.31   41.65   41.99   42.00   42.25   42.46   43.40
   43.40   44.16   44.55   44.91   47.05   47.89   48.18   50.26   50.61   52.67
   54.19   54.85   54.89   59.50   62.14   63.81   64.33   66.33   66.42   68.07
   68.17   71.43   73.58   77.39   78.31   78.76   78.77   80.77   80.81   83.39
   83.71   90.15  110.09  110.45

DISTRIBUTION OF INPUT DATA

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1     13.91    56    56   0.126   0.126
       2     19.28   155   211   0.348   0.474
       3     24.64    93   304   0.209   0.683
       4     30.00    55   359   0.124   0.807
       5     35.37    31   390   0.070   0.876
       6     40.73    12   402   0.027   0.903
       7     46.09    13   415   0.029   0.933
       8     51.46     5   420   0.011   0.944
       9     56.82     4   424   0.009   0.953
      10     62.18     2   426   0.004   0.957
      11     67.54     4   430   0.009   0.966
      12     72.91     3   433   0.007   0.973
      13     78.27     2   435   0.004   0.978
      14     83.63     6   441   0.013   0.991
      15     89.00     1   442   0.002   0.993
      16     94.36     1   443   0.002   0.996
      17     99.72     0   443   0.000   0.996
      18    105.09     0   443   0.000   0.996
      19    110.45     2   445   0.004   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 |      .              .
       2 |>
       3 |>
       4 |       .              .
       5 |        .              .              .
       6 |      .              .              .              .
       7 |     .              .              .              .
       8 |           .              .              .              .
       9 |           .              .              .              .
      10 |             .              .              .              .
      11 |           .              .              .              .
      12 |            .              .              .              .
      13 |             .              .              .              .
      14 |          .              .              .              .
      15 |             .              .              .              .
      16 |             .              .              .              .
      17 |              .              .              .              .
      18 |              .              .              .              .
      19 |             .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TO GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION

                                 Value    Prob
Coefficient of skewness:         2.682   0.000
Coefficient of kurtosis:         8.833   0.000
Anderson-Darling's Asquare:     34.917   0.000
Cramer-von Mises's Wsquare:      6.237   0.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's Dmax:       0.189   0.000

ESTIMATES OF REFERENCE LIMITS AND THEIR CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Non-parametric estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       10.67        10.14 ..   11.41
        0.975       76.82        64.33 ..   80.81

Bootstrap estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       10.77        10.22 ..   11.32
        0.975       74.26        65.39 ..   83.12

Input data for combination of the two sugroups in RUN #1 is read from files:
C:\LAK_lsd\gtfu40_OutliersDropped.txt
C:\LAK_lsd\gtfo40.txt
727 reference values entered

LISTING OF SORTED INPUT DATA (first ~10% of the data points .. last ~10% of the data points)

    8.13    8.55    9.10    9.11    9.14    9.29    9.66    9.78    9.94    9.97
    9.99   10.01   10.14   10.14   10.15   10.31   10.41   10.44   10.56   10.62
   10.65   10.75   10.77   10.78   10.95   11.00   11.03   11.03   11.04   11.14
   11.16   11.17   11.24   11.31   11.41   11.52   11.57   11.57   11.58   11.59
   11.59   11.62   11.63   11.69   11.69   11.72   11.73   11.74   11.78   11.80
   11.81   11.83   11.88   11.88   11.93   11.94   11.95   11.96   12.00   12.17
   12.17   12.18   12.28   12.31   12.51   12.56   12.61   12.64   12.67   12.68
   12.69   12.73
..
   34.54   34.63   34.71   34.79   34.89   35.23   35.40   35.54   35.66   35.93
   36.27   36.86   37.34   37.61   37.76   37.81   38.30   39.07   39.71   39.80
   40.56   40.65   40.75   41.00   41.31   41.65   41.99   42.00   42.25   42.46
   42.59   43.06   43.40   43.40   44.16   44.55   44.91   47.05   47.89   48.18
   48.44   50.26   50.40   50.61   52.67   53.86   54.19   54.85   54.89   59.50
   62.14   62.89   63.81   64.33   66.33   66.42   68.07   68.17   69.36   71.43
   73.58   77.39   78.31   78.76   78.77   80.77   80.81   83.39   83.71   90.15
  110.09  110.45

DISTRIBUTION OF INPUT DATA

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1     13.52   105   105   0.144   0.144
       2     18.90   280   385   0.385   0.530
       3     24.29   147   532   0.202   0.732
       4     29.67    82   614   0.113   0.845
       5     35.06    46   660   0.063   0.908
       6     40.44    15   675   0.021   0.928
       7     45.83    17   692   0.023   0.952
       8     51.21     7   699   0.010   0.961
       9     56.60     5   704   0.007   0.968
      10     61.98     1   705   0.001   0.970
      11     67.37     6   711   0.008   0.978
      12     72.75     4   715   0.006   0.983
      13     78.14     2   717   0.003   0.986
      14     83.52     6   723   0.008   0.994
      15     88.91     1   724   0.001   0.996
      16     94.29     1   725   0.001   0.997
      17     99.68     0   725   0.000   0.997
      18    105.06     0   725   0.000   0.997
      19    110.45     2   727   0.003   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 | .              .
       2 |>
       3 |>
       4 |          .              .
       5 |          .              .              .
       6 |        .              .              .              .
       7 |       .              .              .              .
       8 |           .              .              .              .
       9 |            .              .              .              .
      10 |              .              .              .              .
      11 |            .              .              .              .
      12 |            .              .              .              .
      13 |             .              .              .              .
      14 |            .              .              .              .
      15 |              .              .              .              .
      16 |              .              .              .              .
      17 |              .              .              .              .
      18 |              .              .              .              .
      19 |             .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TO GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION

                                 Value    Prob
Coefficient of skewness:         2.973   0.000
Coefficient of kurtosis:        11.727   0.000
Anderson-Darling's Asquare:     54.312   0.000
Cramer-von Mises's Wsquare:      9.723   0.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's Dmax:       0.175   0.000

ESTIMATES OF COMMON REFERENCE LIMITS, SUBGROUP PROPORTIONS, AND THEIR CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Non-parametric estimates for the reference limits of the combined distribution: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       10.46        10.01 ..   11.00
        0.975       65.93        54.19 ..   73.58

Nonparametric estimates for the proportions of the subgroup distributions:
     Proportion                      Percent   0.90-confidence interval
     Lower end of distribution 1        3.55         2.47 ..    4.46
     Lower end of distribution 2        1.87         1.15 ..    3.14
     Upper end of distribution 1        0.54         0.00 ..    1.05
     Upper end of distribution 2        3.86         2.69 ..    5.38
Conclusions on partitioning using these proportions: 
Conclusion from the lower end is marginal.
Conclusion from the upper end is partitioning.
***** The final conclusion is partitioning.

Bootstrap estimates for the reference limits of the combined distribution: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       10.49        10.01 ..   10.97
        0.975       64.53        55.56 ..   73.50

Bootstrap estimates for the proportions of the subgroup distributions 
(proportions calculated at each step of the bootstrapping procedure): 
     Proportion                      Percent   0.90-confidence interval
     Lower end of distribution 1        3.50         2.50 ..    4.50
     Lower end of distribution 2        2.09         1.04 ..    3.13
     Upper end of distribution 1        0.59         0.09 ..    1.08
     Upper end of distribution 2        3.96         2.66 ..    5.26
Conclusions on partitioning using these proportions: 
Conclusion from the lower end is marginal.
Conclusion from the upper end is partitioning.
***** The final conclusion is partitioning.

Bootstrap estimates for the proportions of the subgroup distributions 
(proportions calculated directly from the bootstrap reference limits): 
     Proportion                       Percent   0.90-confidence interval
     Lower end of distribution 1        3.59         2.47 ..    4.33
     Lower end of distribution 2        1.91         1.15 ..    3.11
     Upper end of distribution 1        0.62         0.00 ..    0.99
     Upper end of distribution 2        4.01         2.70 ..    4.90
Conclusions on partitioning using these proportions: 
Conclusion from the lower end is marginal.
Conclusion from the upper end is partitioning.
***** The final conclusion is partitioning.
End of RUN #1 at 16.05.2003 15:47:49

 
 
***** Starting new run
RUN #2 at 16.05.2003 15:47:50 using Partitioning program based on RefVal 4.0

Input data for subgroup 1 in RUN #2 is read from file: 
C:\LAK_lsd\gtmu40.txt
244 reference values entered

LISTING OF SORTED INPUT DATA (first ~10% of the data points .. last ~10% of the data points)

    7.86   10.49   10.97   11.33   11.87   12.30   12.40   12.99   13.05   13.05
   13.07   13.15   13.29   13.80   13.89   13.89   13.93   14.50   14.50   14.53
   14.55   14.60   14.68   14.74
..
   45.28   45.70   46.00   46.16   48.46   48.73   49.48   49.56   50.43   52.13
   52.56   54.49   55.57   55.58   56.98   60.29   66.22   78.04   78.44   86.51
   87.99   90.16  168.16  172.53

DISTRIBUTION OF INPUT DATA

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1     16.53    41    41   0.168   0.168
       2     25.19   100   141   0.410   0.578
       3     33.86    61   202   0.250   0.828
       4     42.53    14   216   0.057   0.885
       5     51.19    13   229   0.053   0.939
       6     59.86     6   235   0.025   0.963
       7     68.53     2   237   0.008   0.971
       8     77.19     0   237   0.000   0.971
       9     85.86     2   239   0.008   0.980
      10     94.53     3   242   0.012   0.992
      11    103.20     0   242   0.000   0.992
      12    111.86     0   242   0.000   0.992
      13    120.53     0   242   0.000   0.992
      14    129.20     0   242   0.000   0.992
      15    137.86     0   242   0.000   0.992
      16    146.53     0   242   0.000   0.992
      17    155.20     0   242   0.000   0.992
      18    163.86     0   242   0.000   0.992
      19    172.53     2   244   0.008   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 |         .
       2 |>
       3 |>
       4 |            .              .              .
       5 |             .              .              .
       6 |       .              .              .              .
       7 |            .              .              .              .
       8 |              .              .              .              .
       9 |            .              .              .              .
      10 |          .              .              .              .
      11 |              .              .              .              .
      12 |              .              .              .              .
      13 |              .              .              .              .
      14 |              .              .              .              .
      15 |              .              .              .              .
      16 |              .              .              .              .
      17 |              .              .              .              .
      18 |              .              .              .              .
      19 |            .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TO GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION

                                 Value    Prob
Coefficient of skewness:         4.492   0.000
Coefficient of kurtosis:        28.860   0.000
Anderson-Darling's Asquare:     20.907   0.000
Cramer-von Mises's Wsquare:      3.849   0.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's Dmax:       0.206   0.000

ESTIMATES OF REFERENCE LIMITS AND THEIR CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Non-parametric estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       12.31        10.49 ..   13.07
        0.975       78.39        55.58 ..  168.16

Bootstrap estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       12.29        11.20 ..   13.38
        0.975       77.77        54.35 ..  101.19

Input data for subgroup 2 in RUN #2 is read from file: 
C:\LAK_lsd\gtmo40.txt
409 reference values entered

LISTING OF SORTED INPUT DATA (first ~10% of the data points .. last ~10% of the data points)

    9.24   12.35   12.94   13.55   13.83   14.31   14.33   14.61   14.71   14.76
   14.83   15.09   15.10   15.24   15.31   15.31   15.77   15.82   15.86   15.95
   15.99   16.13   16.26   16.31   16.33   16.34   16.34   16.41   16.45   16.50
   16.51   16.55   16.89   16.92   16.95   16.98   16.99   17.00   17.00   17.03
..
   63.69   64.00   66.04   67.40   68.46   69.46   69.67   69.74   70.32   71.24
   71.75   76.53   76.65   77.75   78.24   78.95   79.34   79.50   80.87   82.24
   84.70   90.25   91.08   99.15   99.54   99.77  105.34  108.21  109.68  113.78
  114.26  115.04  117.08  118.43  125.14  134.20  138.56  150.94  151.00  198.72

DISTRIBUTION OF INPUT DATA

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1     19.21    65    65   0.159   0.159
       2     29.19   134   199   0.328   0.487
       3     39.16    88   287   0.215   0.702
       4     49.13    47   334   0.115   0.817
       5     59.10    23   357   0.056   0.873
       6     69.08    17   374   0.042   0.914
       7     79.05    11   385   0.027   0.941
       8     89.02     5   390   0.012   0.954
       9     98.99     2   392   0.005   0.958
      10    108.97     5   397   0.012   0.971
      11    118.94     6   403   0.015   0.985
      12    128.91     1   404   0.002   0.988
      13    138.88     2   406   0.005   0.993
      14    148.86     0   406   0.000   0.993
      15    158.83     2   408   0.005   0.998
      16    168.80     0   408   0.000   0.998
      17    178.77     0   408   0.000   0.998
      18    188.75     0   408   0.000   0.998
      19    198.72     1   409   0.002   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 |           .
       2 |>
       3 |>
       4 |          .              .
       5 |            .              .              .
       6 |  .              .              .              .
       7 |      .              .              .              .
       8 |          .              .              .              .
       9 |             .              .              .              .
      10 |          .              .              .              .
      11 |          .              .              .              .
      12 |             .              .              .              .
      13 |             .              .              .              .
      14 |              .              .              .              .
      15 |             .              .              .              .
      16 |              .              .              .              .
      17 |              .              .              .              .
      18 |              .              .              .              .
      19 |             .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TO GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION

                                 Value    Prob
Coefficient of skewness:         2.583   0.000
Coefficient of kurtosis:         9.039   0.000
Anderson-Darling's Asquare:     27.263   0.000
Cramer-von Mises's Wsquare:      4.830   0.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's Dmax:       0.174   0.000

ESTIMATES OF REFERENCE LIMITS AND THEIR CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Non-parametric estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       14.78        13.83 ..   15.77
        0.975      114.14        99.15 ..  134.20

Bootstrap estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       14.88        14.22 ..   15.55
        0.975      112.40        99.04 ..  125.75

Input data for combination of the two sugroups in RUN #2 is read from files:
C:\LAK_lsd\gtmu40.txt
C:\LAK_lsd\gtmo40.txt
653 reference values entered

LISTING OF SORTED INPUT DATA (first ~10% of the data points .. last ~10% of the data points)

    7.86    9.24   10.49   10.97   11.33   11.87   12.30   12.35   12.40   12.94
   12.99   13.05   13.05   13.07   13.15   13.29   13.55   13.80   13.83   13.89
   13.89   13.93   14.31   14.33   14.50   14.50   14.53   14.55   14.60   14.61
   14.68   14.71   14.74   14.74   14.76   14.83   14.90   14.99   14.99   15.02
   15.02   15.06   15.09   15.10   15.16   15.24   15.31   15.31   15.44   15.77
   15.81   15.82   15.86   15.89   15.95   15.99   16.03   16.13   16.23   16.26
   16.30   16.31   16.31   16.33   16.34
..
   56.59   56.83   56.98   58.15   59.51   60.27   60.29   61.30   61.44   61.96
   62.04   62.31   62.47   62.61   62.67   62.76   63.22   63.69   64.00   66.04
   66.22   67.40   68.46   69.46   69.67   69.74   70.32   71.24   71.75   76.53
   76.65   77.75   78.04   78.24   78.44   78.95   79.34   79.50   80.87   82.24
   84.70   86.51   87.99   90.16   90.25   91.08   99.15   99.54   99.77  105.34
  108.21  109.68  113.78  114.26  115.04  117.08  118.43  125.14  134.20  138.56
  150.94  151.00  168.16  172.53  198.72

DISTRIBUTION OF INPUT DATA

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1     17.91   101   101   0.155   0.155
       2     27.95   254   355   0.389   0.544
       3     38.00   133   488   0.204   0.747
       4     48.04    67   555   0.103   0.850
       5     58.09    36   591   0.055   0.905
       6     68.13    19   610   0.029   0.934
       7     78.18    11   621   0.017   0.951
       8     88.22    10   631   0.015   0.966
       9     98.27     3   634   0.005   0.971
      10    108.31     5   639   0.008   0.979

      11    118.36     5   644   0.008   0.986
      12    128.40     2   646   0.003   0.989
      13    138.45     1   647   0.002   0.991
      14    148.49     1   648   0.002   0.992
      15    158.54     2   650   0.003   0.995
      16    168.58     1   651   0.002   0.997
      17    178.63     1   652   0.002   0.998
      18    188.67     0   652   0.000   0.998
      19    198.72     1   653   0.002   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 |             .
       2 |>
       3 |>
       4 |             .              .
       5 |            .              .              .
       6 |     .              .              .              .
       7 |         .              .              .              .
       8 |         .              .              .              .
       9 |             .              .              .              .
      10 |            .              .              .              .
      11 |            .              .              .              .
      12 |             .              .              .              .
      13 |              .              .              .              .
      14 |              .              .              .              .
      15 |             .              .              .              .
      16 |              .              .              .              .
      17 |              .              .              .              .
      18 |              .              .              .              .
      19 |              .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TO GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION

                                 Value    Prob
Coefficient of skewness:         3.003   0.000
Coefficient of kurtosis:        12.417   0.000
Anderson-Darling's Asquare:     48.415   0.000
Cramer-von Mises's Wsquare:      8.749   0.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's Dmax:       0.187   0.000

ESTIMATES OF COMMON REFERENCE LIMITS, SUBGROUP PROPORTIONS, AND THEIR CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Non-parametric estimates for the reference limits of the combined distribution: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       13.38        12.94 ..   14.33
        0.975      103.39        86.51 ..  117.08

Nonparametric estimates for the proportions of the subgroup distributions:
     Proportion                      Percent   0.90-confidence interval
     Lower end of distribution 1        5.38         3.23 ..    7.23
     Lower end of distribution 2        0.91         0.73 ..    1.71
     Upper end of distribution 1        1.16         1.08 ..    2.04
     Upper end of distribution 2        3.50         1.95 ..    4.80
Conclusions on partitioning using these proportions: 
Conclusion from the lower end is partitioning.
Conclusion from the upper end is marginal.
***** The final conclusion is partitioning.

Bootstrap estimates for the reference limits of the combined distribution: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       13.49        12.76 ..   14.22
        0.975      102.62        87.03 ..  118.22

Bootstrap estimates for the proportions of the subgroup distributions 
(proportions calculated at each step of the bootstrapping procedure): 
     Proportion                      Percent   0.90-confidence interval
     Lower end of distribution 1        5.31         3.40 ..    7.23
     Lower end of distribution 2        1.02         0.54 ..    1.51
     Upper end of distribution 1        1.23         0.79 ..    1.68
     Upper end of distribution 2        3.55         2.16 ..    4.94
Conclusions on partitioning using these proportions: 
Conclusion from the lower end is partitioning.
Conclusion from the upper end is marginal.
***** The final conclusion is partitioning.

Bootstrap estimates for the proportions of the subgroup distributions 
(proportions calculated directly from the bootstrap reference limits): 
     Proportion                       Percent   0.90-confidence interval
     Lower end of distribution 1        5.47         3.11 ..    7.15
     Lower end of distribution 2        0.95         0.66 ..    1.42
     Upper end of distribution 1        1.16         1.08 ..    1.90
     Upper end of distribution 2        3.53         1.75 ..    4.78
Conclusions on partitioning using these proportions: 
Conclusion from the lower end is partitioning.
Conclusion from the upper end is marginal.
***** The final conclusion is partitioning.
End of RUN #2 at 16.05.2003 15:48:02