***** Starting new run
RUN #1 at 16.05.2003 15:39:57 using Partitioning program based on RefVal 4.0

Input data for subgroup 1 in RUN #1 is read from file: 
C:\LAK_lsd\plasma\gtfu40.txt
113 reference values entered

LISTING OF SORTED INPUT DATA (first ~10% of the data points .. last ~10% of the data points)

    7.71    8.93    9.41   10.09   10.48   10.52   10.75   10.86   10.97   11.19
   11.20
..
   29.76   29.88   30.74   31.01   31.43   37.86   38.00   39.57   40.93   47.81
   50.12

DISTRIBUTION OF INPUT DATA

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1      9.94     3     3   0.027   0.027
       2     12.17     9    12   0.080   0.106
       3     14.41    31    43   0.274   0.381
       4     16.64    16    59   0.142   0.522
       5     18.87    18    77   0.159   0.681
       6     21.10     9    86   0.080   0.761
       7     23.33     7    93   0.062   0.823
       8     25.57     5    98   0.044   0.867
       9     27.80     4   102   0.035   0.903
      10     30.03     2   104   0.018   0.920
      11     32.26     3   107   0.027   0.947
      12     34.50     0   107   0.000   0.947
      13     36.73     0   107   0.000   0.947
      14     38.96     2   109   0.018   0.965
      15     41.19     2   111   0.018   0.982
      16     43.42     0   111   0.000   0.982
      17     45.66     0   111   0.000   0.982
      18     47.89     1   112   0.009   0.991
      19     50.12     1   113   0.009   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 |      .              .              .              .
       2 |     .              .              .
       3 |>
       4 |  .              .
       5 |           .
       6 |     .              .              .
       7 |          .              .              .
       8 | .              .              .              .
       9 |   .              .              .              .
      10 |         .              .              .              .
      11 |      .              .              .              .
      12 |              .              .              .              .
      13 |              .              .              .              .
      14 |         .              .              .              .
      15 |         .              .              .              .
      16 |              .              .              .              .
      17 |              .              .              .              .
      18 |           .              .              .              .
      19 |           .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TO GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION

                                 Value    Prob
Coefficient of skewness:         1.897   0.000
Coefficient of kurtosis:         4.255   0.000
Anderson-Darling's Asquare:      5.655   0.000
Cramer-von Mises's Wsquare:      0.975   0.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's Dmax:       0.165   0.000

ESTIMATES OF REFERENCE LIMITS AND THEIR CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Non-parametric estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025        9.34        ***** ..   *****
        0.975       41.96        ***** ..   *****

Bootstrap estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025        9.52         8.17 ..   10.88
        0.975       42.48        34.53 ..   50.44

Input data for subgroup 2 in RUN #1 is read from file: 
C:\LAK_lsd\plasma\gtfo40.txt
206 reference values entered

LISTING OF SORTED INPUT DATA (first ~10% of the data points .. last ~10% of the data points)

   -4.66    3.18    4.22    7.46    8.52    9.27    9.41    9.47    9.98   10.00
   10.01   10.50   10.77   11.26   11.35   11.37   11.77   11.85   11.86   11.91
..
   42.00   42.80   43.10   47.50   50.62   50.79   52.01   52.70   53.52   60.89
   61.09   61.82   63.99   72.31   72.93   78.09   78.30   87.87   91.62  106.70

DISTRIBUTION OF INPUT DATA

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1      1.20     1     1   0.005   0.005
       2      7.06     2     3   0.010   0.015
       3     12.92    21    24   0.102   0.117
       4     18.78    64    88   0.311   0.427
       5     24.65    46   134   0.223   0.650
       6     30.51    28   162   0.136   0.786
       7     36.37    20   182   0.097   0.883
       8     42.23     5   187   0.024   0.908
       9     48.09     3   190   0.015   0.922
      10     53.95     5   195   0.024   0.947
      11     59.81     0   195   0.000   0.947
      12     65.67     4   199   0.019   0.966
      13     71.53     0   199   0.000   0.966
      14     77.39     2   201   0.010   0.976
      15     83.26     2   203   0.010   0.985
      16     89.12     1   204   0.005   0.990
      17     94.98     1   205   0.005   0.995
      18    100.84     0   205   0.000   0.995
      19    106.70     1   206   0.005   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 |             .              .              .              .
       2 |           .              .              .              .
       3 |             .              .
       4 |>
       5 |>
       6 |   .              .
       7 |.              .              .
       8 |       .              .              .              .
       9 |          .              .              .              .
      10 |       .              .              .              .
      11 |              .              .              .              .
      12 |        .              .              .              .
      13 |              .              .              .              .
      14 |           .              .              .              .
      15 |           .              .              .              .
      16 |             .              .              .              .
      17 |             .              .              .              .
      18 |              .              .              .              .
      19 |             .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TO GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION

                                 Value    Prob
Coefficient of skewness:         2.340   0.000
Coefficient of kurtosis:         7.003   0.000
Anderson-Darling's Asquare:     12.919   0.000
Cramer-von Mises's Wsquare:      2.269   0.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's Dmax:       0.171   0.000

ESTIMATES OF REFERENCE LIMITS AND THEIR CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Non-parametric estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025        8.65         3.18 ..   10.00
        0.975       77.19        61.09 ..   91.62

Bootstrap estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025        8.02         4.57 ..   11.47
        0.975       75.85        62.02 ..   89.68

Input data for combination of the two sugroups in RUN #1 is read from files:
C:\LAK_lsd\plasma\gtfu40.txt
C:\LAK_lsd\plasma\gtfo40.txt
319 reference values entered

LISTING OF SORTED INPUT DATA (first ~10% of the data points .. last ~10% of the data points)

   -4.66    3.18    4.22    7.46    7.71    8.52    8.93    9.27    9.41    9.41
    9.47    9.98   10.00   10.01   10.09   10.48   10.50   10.52   10.75   10.77
   10.86   10.97   11.19   11.20   11.26   11.35   11.37   11.77   11.85   11.86
   11.88
..
   36.29   37.86   38.00   39.57   40.08   40.71   40.73   40.93   41.04   42.00
   42.80   43.10   47.50   47.81   50.12   50.62   50.79   52.01   52.70   53.52
   60.89   61.09   61.82   63.99   72.31   72.93   78.09   78.30   87.87   91.62
  106.70

DISTRIBUTION OF INPUT DATA

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1      1.20     1     1   0.003   0.003
       2      7.06     2     3   0.006   0.009
       3     12.92    42    45   0.132   0.141
       4     18.78   118   163   0.370   0.511
       5     24.65    67   230   0.210   0.721
       6     30.51    36   266   0.113   0.834
       7     36.37    23   289   0.072   0.906
       8     42.23     9   298   0.028   0.934
       9     48.09     4   302   0.013   0.947
      10     53.95     6   308   0.019   0.966
      11     59.81     0   308   0.000   0.966
      12     65.67     4   312   0.013   0.978
      13     71.53     0   312   0.000   0.978
      14     77.39     2   314   0.006   0.984
      15     83.26     2   316   0.006   0.991
      16     89.12     1   317   0.003   0.994
      17     94.98     1   318   0.003   0.997
      18    100.84     0   318   0.000   0.997
      19    106.70     1   319   0.003   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 |             .              .              .              .
       2 |            .              .              .              .
       3 |     .              .
       4 |>
       5 |>
       6 |          .              .
       7 |       .              .              .
       8 |      .              .              .              .
       9 |          .              .              .              .
      10 |        .              .              .              .
      11 |              .              .              .              .
      12 |          .              .              .              .
      13 |              .              .              .              .
      14 |            .              .              .              .
      15 |            .              .              .              .
      16 |             .              .              .              .
      17 |             .              .              .              .
      18 |              .              .              .              .
      19 |             .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TO GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION

                                 Value    Prob
Coefficient of skewness:         2.666   0.000
Coefficient of kurtosis:         9.677   0.000
Anderson-Darling's Asquare:     20.771   0.000
Cramer-von Mises's Wsquare:      3.685   0.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's Dmax:       0.171   0.000

ESTIMATES OF COMMON REFERENCE LIMITS, SUBGROUP PROPORTIONS, AND THEIR CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Non-parametric estimates for the reference limits of the combined distribution: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025        9.27         7.46 ..   10.01
        0.975       63.99        52.01 ..   78.30

Nonparametric estimates for the proportions of the subgroup distributions:
     Proportion                      Percent   0.90-confidence interval
     Lower end of distribution 1        2.38         0.00 ..    3.41
     Lower end of distribution 2        2.90         1.93 ..    5.31
     Upper end of distribution 1        0.00         0.00 ..    0.00
     Upper end of distribution 2        3.86         1.93 ..    6.76
Conclusions on partitioning using these proportions: 
Conclusion from the lower end is nonpartitioning.
Conclusion from the upper end is partitioning.
***** The final conclusion is partitioning.

Bootstrap estimates for the reference limits of the combined distribution: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025        9.03         7.59 ..   10.47
        0.975       65.87        52.31 ..   79.43

Bootstrap estimates for the proportions of the subgroup distributions 
(proportions calculated at each step of the bootstrapping procedure): 
     Proportion                      Percent   0.90-confidence interval
     Lower end of distribution 1        2.19         0.63 ..    3.76
     Lower end of distribution 2        3.15         1.61 ..    4.69
     Upper end of distribution 1        0.01         0.00 ..    0.16
     Upper end of distribution 2        4.07         1.91 ..    6.22
Conclusions on partitioning using these proportions: 
Conclusion from the lower end is nonpartitioning.
Conclusion from the upper end is partitioning.
***** The final conclusion is partitioning.

Bootstrap estimates for the proportions of the subgroup distributions 
(proportions calculated directly from the bootstrap reference limits): 
     Proportion                       Percent   0.90-confidence interval
     Lower end of distribution 1        1.94         0.00 ..    4.36
     Lower end of distribution 2        2.74         1.99 ..    5.77
     Upper end of distribution 1        0.00         0.00 ..    0.00
     Upper end of distribution 2        3.76         1.88 ..    6.55
Conclusions on partitioning using these proportions: 
Conclusion from the lower end is nonpartitioning.
Conclusion from the upper end is partitioning.
***** The final conclusion is partitioning.
End of RUN #1 at 16.05.2003 15:40:42

 
 
***** Starting new run
RUN #2 at 16.05.2003 15:40:44 using Partitioning program based on RefVal 4.0

Input data for subgroup 1 in RUN #2 is read from file: 
C:\LAK_lsd\plasma\gtmu40.txt
104 reference values entered

LISTING OF SORTED INPUT DATA (first ~10% of the data points .. last ~10% of the data points)

    9.97   10.71   11.22   12.23   14.25   14.27   14.46   14.53   14.84   14.96
..
   46.52   47.27   55.54   57.14   60.60   75.27   83.87   85.80  168.16  171.72

DISTRIBUTION OF INPUT DATA

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1     18.48    30    30   0.288   0.288
       2     27.00    37    67   0.356   0.644
       3     35.51    17    84   0.163   0.808
       4     44.02     7    91   0.067   0.875
       5     52.54     5    96   0.048   0.923
       6     61.05     3    99   0.029   0.952
       7     69.56     0    99   0.000   0.952
       8     78.08     1   100   0.010   0.962
       9     86.59     2   102   0.019   0.981
      10     95.10     0   102   0.000   0.981
      11    103.61     0   102   0.000   0.981
      12    112.13     0   102   0.000   0.981
      13    120.64     0   102   0.000   0.981
      14    129.15     0   102   0.000   0.981
      15    137.67     0   102   0.000   0.981
      16    146.18     0   102   0.000   0.981
      17    154.69     0   102   0.000   0.981
      18    163.21     0   102   0.000   0.981
      19    171.72     2   104   0.019   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 |>
       2 |>
       3 |          .
       4 |         .              .              .
       5 |.              .              .              .
       6 |     .              .              .              .
       7 |              .              .              .              .
       8 |           .              .              .              .
       9 |        .              .              .              .
      10 |              .              .              .              .
      11 |              .              .              .              .
      12 |              .              .              .              .
      13 |              .              .              .              .
      14 |              .              .              .              .
      15 |              .              .              .              .
      16 |              .              .              .              .
      17 |              .              .              .              .
      18 |              .              .              .              .
      19 |        .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TO GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION

                                 Value    Prob
Coefficient of skewness:         4.151   0.000
Coefficient of kurtosis:        21.081   0.000
Anderson-Darling's Asquare:     11.155   0.000
Cramer-von Mises's Wsquare:      2.051   0.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's Dmax:       0.228   0.000

ESTIMATES OF REFERENCE LIMITS AND THEIR CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Non-parametric estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       11.03        ***** ..   *****
        0.975      116.69        ***** ..   *****

Bootstrap estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       11.51         9.53 ..   13.49
        0.975      121.49        57.93 ..  185.06

Input data for subgroup 2 in RUN #2 is read from file: 
C:\LAK_lsd\plasma\gtmo40.txt
185 reference values entered

LISTING OF SORTED INPUT DATA (first ~10% of the data points .. last ~10% of the data points)

    9.95   10.58   11.82   12.48   12.62   12.64   13.34   14.17   14.48   14.55
   14.75   14.79   15.36   15.49   15.70   15.83   15.98   16.03
..
   59.89   60.05   62.32   62.77   63.33   67.11   69.61   70.32   72.29   72.56
   75.35   84.04  108.38  109.23  110.22  123.66  126.77  190.32

DISTRIBUTION OF INPUT DATA

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1     19.44    41    41   0.222   0.222
       2     28.94    60   101   0.324   0.546
       3     38.43    38   139   0.205   0.751
       4     47.92    18   157   0.097   0.849
       5     57.42    10   167   0.054   0.903
       6     66.91     5   172   0.027   0.930
       7     76.40     6   178   0.032   0.962
       8     85.90     1   179   0.005   0.968
       9     95.39     0   179   0.000   0.968
      10    104.88     0   179   0.000   0.968
      11    114.37     3   182   0.016   0.984
      12    123.87     1   183   0.005   0.989
      13    133.36     1   184   0.005   0.995
      14    142.85     0   184   0.000   0.995
      15    152.35     0   184   0.000   0.995
      16    161.84     0   184   0.000   0.995
      17    171.33     0   184   0.000   0.995
      18    180.83     0   184   0.000   0.995
      19    190.32     1   185   0.005   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 |>
       2 |>
       3 |>
       4 |.              .              .
       5 |             .              .              .
       6 |      .              .              .              .
       7 |    .              .              .              .
       8 |            .              .              .              .
       9 |              .              .              .              .
      10 |              .              .              .              .
      11 |         .              .              .              .
      12 |            .              .              .              .
      13 |            .              .              .              .
      14 |              .              .              .              .
      15 |              .              .              .              .
      16 |              .              .              .              .
      17 |              .              .              .              .
      18 |              .              .              .              .
      19 |            .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

1 outlier(s) dropped:
         190.32
184 values are remaining

DISTRIBUTION WITH OUTLIER(S) REMOVED

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1     16.10    18    18   0.098   0.098
       2     22.25    38    56   0.207   0.304
       3     28.40    41    97   0.223   0.527
       4     34.54    28   125   0.152   0.679
       5     40.69    21   146   0.114   0.793
       6     46.84     9   155   0.049   0.842
       7     52.99     6   161   0.033   0.875
       8     59.14     6   167   0.033   0.908
       9     65.29     5   172   0.027   0.935
      10     71.43     3   175   0.016   0.951
      11     77.58     3   178   0.016   0.967
      12     83.73     0   178   0.000   0.967
      13     89.88     1   179   0.005   0.973
      14     96.03     0   179   0.000   0.973
      15    102.18     0   179   0.000   0.973
      16    108.32     0   179   0.000   0.973
      17    114.47     3   182   0.016   0.989
      18    120.62     0   182   0.000   0.989
      19    126.77     2   184   0.011   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 |.              .              .
       2 |>
       3 |>
       4 |             .
       5 |          .              .
       6 |              .              .              .
       7 |    .              .              .              .
       8 |    .              .              .              .
       9 |      .              .              .              .
      10 |         .              .              .              .
      11 |         .              .              .              .
      12 |              .              .              .              .
      13 |            .              .              .              .
      14 |              .              .              .              .
      15 |              .              .              .              .
      16 |              .              .              .              .
      17 |         .              .              .              .
      18 |              .              .              .              .
      19 |           .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TO GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION

                                 Value    Prob
Coefficient of skewness:         2.313   0.000
Coefficient of kurtosis:         6.764   0.000
Anderson-Darling's Asquare:     10.266   0.000
Cramer-von Mises's Wsquare:      1.803   0.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's Dmax:       0.173   0.000

ESTIMATES OF REFERENCE LIMITS AND THEIR CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Non-parametric estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       12.57         9.95 ..   14.48
        0.975      108.70        72.29 ..  126.77

Bootstrap estimates: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       12.64        11.08 ..   14.20
        0.975       98.24        71.84 ..  124.64

Input data for combination of the two sugroups in RUN #2 is read from files:
C:\LAK_lsd\plasma\gtmu40.txt
C:\LAK_lsd\plasma\gtmo40_OutliersDropped.txt
288 reference values entered

LISTING OF SORTED INPUT DATA (first ~10% of the data points .. last ~10% of the data points)

    9.95    9.97   10.58   10.71   11.22   11.82   12.23   12.48   12.62   12.64
   13.34   14.17   14.25   14.27   14.46   14.48   14.53   14.55   14.75   14.79
   14.84   14.96   15.04   15.25   15.36   15.45   15.46   15.49
..
   54.60   55.54   56.31   56.93   57.14   59.89   60.05   60.60   62.32   62.77
   63.33   67.11   69.61   70.32   72.29   72.56   75.27   75.35   83.87   84.04
   85.80  108.38  109.23  110.22  123.66  126.77  168.16  171.72

DISTRIBUTION OF INPUT DATA

     Bar  TopLimit     N  Ncum    Freq     Cum
       1     18.46    61    61   0.212   0.212
       2     26.98    95   156   0.330   0.542
       3     35.49    60   216   0.208   0.750
       4     44.01    26   242   0.090   0.840
       5     52.52    14   256   0.049   0.889
       6     61.04    12   268   0.042   0.931
       7     69.55     4   272   0.014   0.944
       8     78.06     6   278   0.021   0.965
       9     86.58     3   281   0.010   0.976
      10     95.09     0   281   0.000   0.976
      11    103.61     0   281   0.000   0.976
      12    112.12     3   284   0.010   0.986
      13    120.63     0   284   0.000   0.986
      14    129.15     2   286   0.007   0.993
      15    137.66     0   286   0.000   0.993
      16    146.18     0   286   0.000   0.993
      17    154.69     0   286   0.000   0.993
      18    163.21     0   286   0.000   0.993
      19    171.72     2   288   0.007   1.000

                                       1                             2
 Percent:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
       1 |>
       2 |>
       3 |>
       4 |  .              .              .
       5 |              .              .              .
       6 |  .              .              .              .
       7 |          .              .              .              .
       8 |        .              .              .              .
       9 |           .              .              .              .
      10 |              .              .              .              .
      11 |              .              .              .              .
      12 |           .              .              .              .
      13 |              .              .              .              .
      14 |            .              .              .              .
      15 |              .              .              .              .
      16 |              .              .              .              .
      17 |              .              .              .              .
      18 |              .              .              .              .
      19 |            .              .              .              .
         +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TO GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION

                                 Value    Prob
Coefficient of skewness:         3.188   0.000
Coefficient of kurtosis:        14.124   0.000
Anderson-Darling's Asquare:     20.525   0.000
Cramer-von Mises's Wsquare:      3.690   0.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov's Dmax:       0.189   0.000

ESTIMATES OF COMMON REFERENCE LIMITS, SUBGROUP PROPORTIONS, AND THEIR CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

Non-parametric estimates for the reference limits of the combined distribution: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       12.29        10.58 ..   14.25
        0.975      103.30        72.56 ..  126.77

Nonparametric estimates for the proportions of the subgroup distributions:
     Proportion                      Percent   0.90-confidence interval
     Lower end of distribution 1        3.84         1.74 ..    4.76
     Lower end of distribution 2        2.01         1.08 ..    4.46
     Upper end of distribution 1        2.65         2.38 ..    4.94
     Upper end of distribution 2        2.82         0.54 ..    4.32
Conclusions on partitioning using these proportions: 
Conclusion from the lower end is marginal.
Conclusion from the upper end is nonpartitioning.
***** The final conclusion is marginal.

Bootstrap estimates for the reference limits of the combined distribution: 
     Fraction   Ref.limit   0.90-confidence interval
        0.025       12.33        10.81 ..   13.85
        0.975       98.71        73.07 ..  124.35

Bootstrap estimates for the proportions of the subgroup distributions 
(proportions calculated at each step of the bootstrapping procedure): 
     Proportion                      Percent   0.90-confidence interval
     Lower end of distribution 1        3.72         2.39 ..    5.05
     Lower end of distribution 2        2.39         0.73 ..    4.05
     Upper end of distribution 1        3.11         1.79 ..    4.44
     Upper end of distribution 2        2.66         1.13 ..    4.18
Conclusions on partitioning using these proportions: 
Conclusion from the lower end is marginal.
Conclusion from the upper end is nonpartitioning.
***** The final conclusion is marginal.

Bootstrap estimates for the proportions of the subgroup distributions 
(proportions calculated directly from the bootstrap reference limits): 
     Proportion                       Percent   0.90-confidence interval
     Lower end of distribution 1        3.86         2.09 ..    4.57
     Lower end of distribution 2        2.04         1.18 ..    4.12
     Upper end of distribution 1        2.71         2.41 ..    4.90
     Upper end of distribution 2        2.92         0.96 ..    4.23
Conclusions on partitioning using these proportions: 
Conclusion from the lower end is marginal.
Conclusion from the upper end is nonpartitioning.
***** The final conclusion is marginal.
End of RUN #2 at 16.05.2003 15:40:53