CK (37ºC)
CAL target
Source: NORIP mean of instrument means for IFCC compatible methods.
Material | Nordic Trueness Project 2002 | Reference method, DGKC 1997 | NORIP | |||||
MEP17-1 transferred value |
Standard uncertainty |
Median | Value | Standard uncertainty | Mean of instrument mean | s | N | |
CAL |
118.8 | 112.3 | 5.6 | 6 | ||||
X |
CAL-corrected mean of control values X, P, HIGH (H), LOW(L)
For each method group all corrected values outside method group mean + 2s are discarded before calculation
Instrument comparisons of mean and standard deviation of CAL
Only CAL values from laboratories with IFCC compatible methods
Y-axis: Concentration/activity. X-axis: Instrument producer (number of cal values in brackets)
Plot: Mean of CAL + 1 standard deviation
Laboratorys mean of CAL relative to "minimum" bias goals...
...expressed as Target value x (1 + 0.375 x CVb) where CVb is total biological variation expressed as a coeffisient of variation (46%)
Method specific %CV (all control values), median, maximum and minimum (no of labs in brackets on X-axis)
Distributions for different method types (both gender)
First corrected for slope/intercept submitted by lab, then corrected by using CAL-target (108.6 U/L)
Number of results and ref.interval in brackets behind description of each distribution
Distributions of reference values according to proposed partitioning criteria for IFCC compatible methods (not CAL-corrected)
Raw data, female, male <50, male >=50
Age related reference intervals
Vitros (Ortho) results included
Values for female >515 and for male >885 are excluded (>4s, log-transformed)
Reference values and - limits (y-axis) against age (x-axis)
The rounded reference limits (red) are proposed by the norwegian enzyme group (see report)
Country differences
Country mean for Hitachi/Modular instruments
Deviation from all mean ± error (2s/n½ where s is standard deviation and n is number of data for each country).
Country reference limits with 90% confidence interval
Partitioning is indicated in the grey rows as Y (yes: <0.9% or >4.1% of subpopulation outside common reference limit), M (moderate: % outside is either in the interval [0.9%,1.8%] or [3.2%, 4.1%]), N (no: % outide is in the interval [1.8%, 3.2%]) as evaluated accoding to Ari Lahti's recommandations (but so far not taken into account).
The conclusions (N, M or Y) for partitioning (grey rows) for "Sum", "F", "M" for each country is relative to respective columns in "All".
CK and relation to sample collection day of week
(Monday=1, Tuesday=2 etc.)
Comments (Pål Rustad): The reason for peak on tuesday and subsequent linear decrease is perhaps in accordance with physical activity on sunday. According to Tietz (Tietz Textbook on Clinical Chemistry, Third edition, 1999), the total CK reaches a peak at about 30 hours after onset of chest pain, and decreases to normal level after about 100 hours.
Cumulative CK distributions for each day of week
Only upper part of distributions are shown
Mean of thawed serum reference values (person results) for each laboratory and instrument producer.
For enzymes, data for both controls and reference values are first recalculated back to original instrument data using slope and intercept reported by each laboratory.
Black points - not corrected by laboratory mean of CAL or X.
Red points - corrected by laboratory mean of CAL or X.
Comments: None.
Maximum, mean and minimum of all reported reference values (person results) for each laboratory sorted on mean.
Comparison Vitros 950 (Ortho)/Hitachi 917 (Roche), thawed serum for one laboratory
Correlation with Body Mass Index (weight/height²)
Only plotted data that are used for reference interval calculation.
Women
Men
Comparisons thawed serum (x)/fresh plasma (y) (regression plot) stpf
Only data for calculating reference intervals used.
Regression model: Passing and Babloc
Software: Analyse-It
Comments: None
Comparisons fresh serum/thawed serum (regression plot) stsf
Only data for calculating reference intervals used .
Regression model: Passing and Babloc
Software: Analyse-It
Comments:
Instrument comparisons thawed serum (x)/fresh plasma (y) korr_sp
Comments: None