ALP (37ºC)
(updated 20/1-2005)
Final reference intervals are calculated from a total of 954 reference values of which 459 serum samples were randomly selected (4 laboratories from each of Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden) and remeasured on Roche Modular* and 495 reference values submitted by laboratories using Vitros instruments. Both methods are compatible with IFCC recommended method at 37 °C.
*Danderyds sjukhus, Stockholm, Odense universitetshospital, Odense and Fürst Medisinsk Laboratorium, Oslo
CAL target
Source: Mean of values from remeasurements by Danderyd, Odense and Fürst Med.Lab.
Material | Nordic Trueness Project 2002 | Reference method, DGKC 1997 | NORIP | |||||
MEP17-1 transferred value |
Standard uncertainty |
Median | Value | Standard uncertainty | Mean | s | N | |
CAL |
64.02 | 1.25 | 35 | |||||
X |
CAL-corrected mean of control values X, P, HIGH (H), LOW(L)
For each method group all corrected values outside method group mean + 2s are discarded before calculation
Instrument comparisons of mean and standard deviation of CAL
Y-axis: Concentration/activity. X-axis: Instrument producer (number of cal values in brackets)
Regression analysis from reanalysis of 459 samples from randomly selected laboratories (4 from each of Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden) on Roche Modular for LD and ALP.
Data used is only from laboratories specified a factor different from 1. The regression (x: Roche, Modular - y: Methods shown in table) have been made using standard regression analysis with the constraint that intercept should be 0. R2 is correlation coefficient and N is number of data.
ALP |
|||
Slope | R2 | N | |
Ortho (Vitros) | 1.022 | 0.8297 | 86 |
Olympus | 0.9617 | 0.9943 | 23 |
Roche (Cobas) | 0.955 | 0.8847 | 67 |
Beckman Coulter | 0.9995 | 0.9876 | 24 |
Dade Behring | 1.0443 | 0.9841 | 28 |
Laboratorys mean of CAL relative to "minimum" bias goals...
...expressed as Target value x (1 + 0.375 x CVb) where CVb is total biological variation expressed as a coeffisient of variation (26%)
Method specific %CV, median (all control values), maximum and minimum (no of labs in brackets on X-axis)
Distributions for different method types (both gender)
First corrected for slope/intercept submitted by lab, then corrected by using CAL-target (64.2 U/L).
Number of results and ref.interval in brackets behind description of each distribution
Distributions of reference values according to proposed partitioning criteria for IFCC compatible methods (not CAL-corrected)
Age related reference intervals
Vitros (Ortho) results included
Values >188 are excluded (>4s, log-transformed)
Reference values and - limits (y-axis) against age (x-axis)
The rounded reference limits (red) are proposed by the norwegian enzyme group (see report)
Country differences
Country mean for Hitachi/Modular instruments
Deviation from all mean ± error (2s/n½ where s is standard deviation and n is number of data for each country).
Finland is included in Denmark label.
Country reference limits with 90% confidence interval.
Partitioning is indicated in the grey rows as Y (yes: <0.9% or >4.1% of subpopulation outside common reference limit), M (moderate: % outside is either in the interval [0.9%,1.8%] or [3.2%, 4.1%]), N (no: % outide is in the interval [1.8%, 3.2%]) as evaluated accoding to Ari Lahti's recommandations (but so far not taken into account).
The conclusions (N, M or Y) for partitioning (grey rows) for "Sum", "F", "M" for each country is relative to respective columns in "All".
Mean of thawed serum reference values (person results) for each laboratory and instrument producer.
For enzymes, data for both controls and reference values are first recalculated back to original instrument data using slope and intercept reported by each laboratory.
Black points - not corrected by laboratory mean of CAL or X.
Red points - corrected by laboratory mean of CAL or X.
Comments: None
Maximum, mean and minimum of all reported reference values (person results) for each laboratory sorted on mean.
Correlation with Body Mass Index (weight/height²)
(only plotted data that are used for reference interval calculation)
Roche Modular and Vitros results
Comparisons thawed serum (x)/fresh plasma (y) (regression plot)
Only Vitros instruments.
Only data for calculating reference intervals used.
Regression model: Passing and Babloc
Software: Analyse-It
Comments: None
Comparisons thawed serum/fresh serum
Only Vitros instruments.
Only data for calculating reference intervals used.
Regression model: Passing and Babloc
Software: Analyse-It
Instrument comparisons thawed serum (x)/fresh plasma (y)